x
_thumbnail_id: Array
article_primary_tag: Array
_article_primary_tag: Array
author: Array
_author: Array
article_modules_0_title: Array
_article_modules_0_title: Array
article_modules_0_content: Array
_article_modules_0_content: Array
article_modules_1_quote_author: Array
_article_modules_1_quote_author: Array
article_modules_1_enable_tweet: Array
_article_modules_1_enable_tweet: Array
article_modules_1_quote: Array
_article_modules_1_quote: Array
article_modules_2_title: Array
_article_modules_2_title: Array
article_modules_2_content: Array
_article_modules_2_content: Array
article_modules: Array
_article_modules: Array
page_summary: Array
_page_summary: Array
modules: Array
_modules: Array
_yoast_wpseo_primary_category: Array
_yoast_wpseo_content_score: Array
_wp_old_slug: Array
_yoast_wpseo_title: Array
_yoast_wpseo_metadesc: Array
modules_0_module_title: Array
_modules_0_module_title: Array
modules_0_background_color: Array
_modules_0_background_color: Array
modules_0_module_type: Array
_modules_0_module_type: Array
modules_0_filter_posts_by_taxonomy: Array
_modules_0_filter_posts_by_taxonomy: Array
modules_0_filter_posts_by_tags: Array
_modules_0_filter_posts_by_tags: Array
modules_0_link_text: Array
_modules_0_link_text: Array
modules_0_link_url: Array
_modules_0_link_url: Array
modules_1_text: Array
_modules_1_text: Array
_yoast_wpseo_focuskw: Array
_yoast_wpseo_linkdex: Array
_wp_old_date: Array
article_modules_3_title: Array
_article_modules_3_title: Array
article_modules_3_content: Array
_article_modules_3_content: Array
_dp_original: Array
_edit_lock: Array
_edit_last: Array
Should central banks join the fight against climate change?
Views

Should central banks join the fight against climate change?

Ahmed Babikir Weekly bulletin January 2020
Climate change was a hot topic last year; Greta Thunberg was named one of the world’s 100 Most Influential People and activists brought London to a standstill. Central banks are now also debating climate change. Last November, the ECB announced its aim of working towards an enhanced stress test, one which incorporates climate related risks. Since then there have been more and more headlines that link climate change and central banks.

As Mark Carney prepares for his new role as UN special envoy for climate action and finance, December’s announcement highlighted a ground-breaking new stress testing regime – one that tests bank’s and insurer’s abilities to cope with three scenarios:

  1. Early Policy Action: an easy and swift transition to a carbon-neutral economy
  2. Late Policy Action: late climate policy action means that we have a delayed transition to meeting global climate targets
  3. No additional policy: no new policies are implemented and global temperatures increase above the cap set by global climate change targets

While this is merely a stress-test that forces banks to consider climate change in their risk management strategies, it could however, push them away from polluting investments. The BoE is currently consulting on the design of the stress tests and the first results will be published in the first half of 2021. On the other side of the Atlantic, the Fed has been reluctant to comment on climate change – being regularly lambasted by Trump for its monetary policies, commenting on climate change could add fuel to the fire.

It might be hard to see at first glance, why central banks are concerned about the global temperature rise. However, last week’s “Green Swan” report issued by the Bank of International Settlements (BIS) – often described as a central bank for central banks – explained why. The report argues that climate change could trigger the world’s next global financial crisis through a fire-sale that may occur if fossil fuel reserves cannot be monetised, turning many assets into “stranded assets”. This could trigger a global financial crisis. When comparing subprime mortgages with highly polluting “stranded assets” similarities with the 2008 crisis are apparent.

Green quantitative easing

As well as prudential supervision, central banks have powerful tools at their disposal to help fight climate change. “Green QE” is a term that has been used by many to describe central banks’ increase of green bond purchases. However, this is easier said than done. At the end of 2018, the ECB held 24% of eligible green public sector bonds and 20% of eligible green corporate bonds. Skewing any asset purchase programme towards green assets risks central banks swallowing the market for green bonds and causing a “green bubble”. Selling carbon-intensive assets is also an option: Sweden’s Riksbank recently announced that it dumped debt issued by Alberta (Canada) and Queensland (Australia) due to its “large carbon footprint”.

Only a few days before the BoE announced its revolutionary climate change-based stress test, we saw a breakdown of talks between governments at the UN Climate Talks (COP25). The talks were meant to define the rules for a new global carbon trading market, which are critical to achieve the Paris Agreement goals. Without governments and politicians playing a leading role in tackling climate change, any input from central banks will be of little or no value. Many central bankers such as Jens Weidmann, the Bundesbank President, have criticised the demands for central banks to fight climate change, stating that “politicians with democratic legitimacy must decide how society should combat climate change and they must also bear the responsibility”.

Whether tackling climate change is within the remit of central banks or not, climate change presents a challenge for the financial sector. Central banks need to ensure readiness for a time when extreme weather and radical climate change policies could severely impact the global economy

For more information, please contact Ahmed Babikir, Associate at Chatham, at ababikir@chathamfinancial.com.

 

Recent Insights

Views
Key financing trends for Australian renewables
Rishin Patel Project Finance & Infrastructure February 2020
Views
Coronavirus – the impact of the unknown
Chris Towner Weekly bulletin February 2020